A few days ago, I came across an intriguing framework for understanding the development of Christendom from a Reformed Anglican or Presbyterian perspective. The author of this framework laid out what has long been recognized by serious students of church history: Christendom has historically encompassed three main branches:
Orthodoxy
Catholicism
Protestantism
The author suggested that a fourth branch, Evangelicalism, has now emerged, distinct in its characteristics and identity from the traditional three. Reflecting on my own 20 years as a Christian, 10 of which I’ve served as a pastor, this framework resonates deeply and, I believe, accurately captures the trends within modern Christianity. Here’s why.
While Evangelicalism emerged out of Protestantism, it has diverged significantly. It often bears more in common with the Anabaptist tradition, characterized by a radical individualism, than with the historical streams of Presbyterianism, Anglicanism, or even Lutheranism. This fourth branch has developed specific traits that distinguish it from the historical Protestant heritage.
Key Characteristics of Evangelicalism
Evangelicalism has emerged as a distinct movement, exhibiting twelve general characteristics:
Followers of Jesus – Rather than identify with historical Protestant labels or creeds, many within this movement prefer terms like “followers of Jesus,” shying away from traditional affiliations with either denominations or confessions.
Nondenominational Identity – Evangelical churches often choose to remain non-denominational or to minimize any denominational ties. Names like “Baptist” or “Church of God” are frequently removed to convey independence from historical church traditions.
Charismatic or Pentecostal Leanings – Charismatic and Pentecostal spirituality, including practices like speaking in tongues, prophesying, and faith healing has become common within Evangelicalism.
The Bible Only (Solo Scriptura) – Evangelicals tend to interpret Scripture apart from the interpretive lens of church history, operating on a “Solo Scriptura” basis rather than the Protestant doctrine of Sola Scriptura, which affirms the authority of Scripture while respecting the historical wisdom of the church.
Mere Christianity – This movement often advocates for a “mere Christianity” approach, emphasizing core doctrines like the Trinity, incarnation, and resurrection but avoiding stances on issues such as church polity, women’s ordination, or the role of sacraments, which are integral in the Protestant tradition.
Noncreedal – Most Evangelical churches avoid formal creeds, such as the Apostles’ or Nicene Creeds, and do not adhere to Reformed confessions like the Westminster Confession of Faith. Instead, they adopt basic statements of faith that lack the theological depth found in historic Protestantism.
Nonliturgical Worship – The Evangelical worship style is typically informal, devoid of structured liturgies or the sacramental focus characteristic of the Protestant tradition.
Contemporary Worship over Hymns – Rather than the rich hymnody or psalm-singing of historic Reformed worship, Evangelical services emphasize contemporary praise music, reflecting a shift from the doctrinal content of hymns to a more emotive worship experience.
Nonsacramental Theology – Evangelicalism often treats ordinances like the Lord’s Supper as symbolic memorials rather than as means of grace. Reformed churches affirm that in Communion, we experience Christ’s real presence, but Evangelicals generally approach it as a personal or communal statement of faith rather than an encounter with Christ’s grace.
Congregational Polity – Evangelical churches usually adopt an independent, congregational model, lacking the episcopal or presbyterian governance structures that provide accountability and connection to the broader church tradition.
Revivalism – Revival meetings, worship nights, and altar calls aimed at generating conversions and personal rededications are hallmarks of Evangelical practice, contrasting with the Reformed emphasis on covenantal worship and discipleship over emotional appeals.
Megachurch Phenomenon – Evangelicalism has seen the rise of megachurches led by prominent pastors who often become central figures in their congregations, contrasting with the Presbyterian focus on shared elder leadership and accountability.
Implications for Reformed and Anglican Churches
Understanding these characteristics sheds light on why there is often tension between Evangelicalism and the historic branches of Christendom. The nature of Evangelicalism’s independence and individualism has led it to evolve away from historical Protestant values, creating a unique branch that is largely unanchored to the traditional foundations of Protestantism.
For Reformed pastors, this framework offers clarity when members express a desire to integrate these Evangelical practices. There is a subtle pressure to adopt Evangelical methods—“Pastor, let’s host a revival to attract more people,” or “We could update our worship by doing away with the hymns and formalities.” These suggestions, while well-meaning, reflect an underlying departure from the Reformed ecclesial identity, which is rooted in Scripture, the sacraments, and confessional integrity.
The original author of this framework laid out these characteristics neutrally, but I find this description illuminating for why so many Reformed churches are struggling to retain their identity in the face of a culture steeped in Evangelical values. As pastors within the Reformed Protestant tradition, it’s vital to recognize this emerging Evangelical branch as distinct from our heritage. Knowing this, we are better equipped to reassert our historical and theological commitments, ensuring our congregations remain faithful to the doctrines and practices of Reformed Christianity in the midst of modern shifts.
Excellent observations, or at least a repackaging of them. I couldn't quite put my finger on what I was seeing and experiencing, but this offered much clarity. I've been Presbyterian my entire life. I've worked at five Presbyterian churches over the past 40 years. During college, I floated around in different denominations but always came back because if the ties to traditions, creeds, rich theology, hymns, etc. A few years ago, we moved our kids into a private, non-denominational Christian school. The contrast was so stark from what I was familiar with. All of the things you mentioned are on display there, daily. It's steeped in the culture. Although we find ourselves completely at odds with the Bible teachers (they all lack formal training and are quite wishy-washy with their obvious lack of Bible knowledge), we still love the people. I bring up the experiences and culture of our church in private conversations, and you can see this look of, "Wow. That sounds so beautiful." I think even they realize they are lacking in beauty and tradition with their windowless, rock-concert, wear-what-you-woke-up-in atmospheres. It's like eating a dingdong. Super tasty but ultimately unfulfilling in the long-term. The fascinating thing is, if you talk to kids who have moved out out of that environment, they are left feeling empty and do not return to church...or go Orthodox (the opposite direction). They need something substantial to ground themselves.
Wanted to write about my experience in the UK:
Church A: Was a church we were at before COVID. Charismatic Anglican - when we were there originally we had a very broad membership - we had a pentecostal missionary (retired), a baptist evangelist and many from within the evangelical wing with a Vicar who was from the HTB network. After COVID the leadership passed to a younger couple who have really dumbed down the teaching to make the church more attractional. Despite a few good preachers on the roster it was still trending towards unchallenging and by chance every Sunday I visited I found that the services were poor, and the roster of worship songs seemed to be at the mawkish and sentimental end. I understand now that this has gone further along that lines with Sundays being for 'Celebration' so as to be attractional and 'Teaching' being done during the week in small groups.
Church B: Started attending during COVID - a truly multidenominational church that importantly had an afternoon service. Mainly for US expats it had an American pastor who was well read (Dallas Willard, Jonathan Haidt and more) who had a low anthropology. Services used to start with a Psalm and a mixture of old and new worship songs and hymns. Sadly his marriage failed he went back to the US (alone) and a S African Pastor took over. Services went back to the am only, new Pastor is very verbose and a bit patronising, loves to talk about 'The Early Church' but basing his understanding of that only from Acts and the Epistles. He kind of sets it up that once you’re a Christian its just a matter of believing as hard as you can and being in Church as much as you can then you'll be free from sin.
The last time I attended he prefaced communion by asking us to take out our phones and proceeded to say that communion is just like the photos we have on our phones - a reminder of things we love. I found this very crass.
Church C: A reformed but very Charismatic church. Liked the people, but I really cannot connect with Charismatic teaching these days. Felt slightly culty. Big on fasting and weeks of prayer. Services are about being filled with the Spirit and then going out into the world.
Church D: Middle of the road Anglican - but with an early morning BCP communion service which I adore.
The communion at Church D feels like balm for the soul - I feel part of a body that exists through time.. But when I go its just me as my family don’t really get it. (I think my wife who was raised Catholic and is very suspicious of anything Catholic and my girls 10 & 12 wouldn’t enjoy it).
So feel unChurched at the moment. I feel that the Church properly understood is participatory, the body of Christ, that the sacraments have efficacy in their own right and that it's not just a case of saying 'the sinners prayer' at an altar call and doing the Alpha course and you're a Christian. Church is seen in this context of somehow 'topping up' the Spirit tank for the week and like a sales meeting for the sales force to get inspired to get out and get more people in. In this basis Churches A to C feel like the same thing to me but just differing in intensity. Maybe that’s why MLM is so popular in evangelical churches.